<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Katha Pollitt Proves Feminism is a Shill for Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/07/20/katha-pollitt-proves-feminism-is-a-shill-for-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/07/20/katha-pollitt-proves-feminism-is-a-shill-for-democrats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:53:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohyouknowkat</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/07/20/katha-pollitt-proves-feminism-is-a-shill-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>ohyouknowkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=2522#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>Katha Pollitt is not a true feminist, nor is she a hardcore Clinton defender in the Journolist emails.

She&#039;s an OBOT, and they are radically different than regular dems.

Here she is calling Chelsea Clinton an ALIEN:


Katha Pollitt
Aug 30, 2008, 11:07am

&quot;It would be quite astonishing if the gov of alaska, a person in full view of the public, could perpetrate this deception. SOMEBody delivered a baby after all — there would be medical records, hospital admissions, etc. But I agree with Addie — she doesn’t look especially pregnant to me in the photo, but then nor does the teen daughter in (supposedly) contemporaneous pictures. Maybe it’s an alien baby, like Hillary’s.&quot;



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/26/raw-journolist-emails-on-palins-downs-child/print/#ixzz0ur7nWOLQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katha Pollitt is not a true feminist, nor is she a hardcore Clinton defender in the Journolist emails.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s an OBOT, and they are radically different than regular dems.</p>
<p>Here she is calling Chelsea Clinton an ALIEN:</p>
<p>Katha Pollitt<br />
Aug 30, 2008, 11:07am</p>
<p>&#8220;It would be quite astonishing if the gov of alaska, a person in full view of the public, could perpetrate this deception. SOMEBody delivered a baby after all — there would be medical records, hospital admissions, etc. But I agree with Addie — she doesn’t look especially pregnant to me in the photo, but then nor does the teen daughter in (supposedly) contemporaneous pictures. Maybe it’s an alien baby, like Hillary’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/26/raw-journolist-emails-on-palins-downs-child/print/#ixzz0ur7nWOLQ" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/26/raw-journolist-emails-on-palins-downs-child/print/#ixzz0ur7nWOLQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrienne</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/07/20/katha-pollitt-proves-feminism-is-a-shill-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=2522#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>I agree with you to a point. I think there&#039;s several levels of feminism. One that actually stands for something and the perception level that Katha Pollitt, Steinem and the Feministing gals represent. While I&#039;ll always disagree with feminists over abortion, there are many issues that agree with (equality, worldwide state of women, effects of the media, etc.). However, there have been few substantive debates on these issues in the past few years. Instead, the feminism that Pollitt and her colleagues spout is taken to represent the entire movement. In this case, perception is reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you to a point. I think there&#8217;s several levels of feminism. One that actually stands for something and the perception level that Katha Pollitt, Steinem and the Feministing gals represent. While I&#8217;ll always disagree with feminists over abortion, there are many issues that agree with (equality, worldwide state of women, effects of the media, etc.). However, there have been few substantive debates on these issues in the past few years. Instead, the feminism that Pollitt and her colleagues spout is taken to represent the entire movement. In this case, perception is reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brando</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/07/20/katha-pollitt-proves-feminism-is-a-shill-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Brando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=2522#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Any principled feminist--and this goes for the feminists I know personally--would and have acknowledged that while they supported Bill Clinton&#039;s policies, they found his actions abhorrent and contemptable.  On the other side of the coin, the Clinton sex scandals did get conservatives to validate much of what feminists had been fighting for--condemnation of sexual harassment and using a power position to get away with such harassment.  The &quot;political hack&quot; feminists like Pollitt and Steinem (and yes, Hillary Clinton) didn&#039;t discredit the principles of feminism so much as their own pathetic selves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any principled feminist&#8211;and this goes for the feminists I know personally&#8211;would and have acknowledged that while they supported Bill Clinton&#8217;s policies, they found his actions abhorrent and contemptable.  On the other side of the coin, the Clinton sex scandals did get conservatives to validate much of what feminists had been fighting for&#8211;condemnation of sexual harassment and using a power position to get away with such harassment.  The &#8220;political hack&#8221; feminists like Pollitt and Steinem (and yes, Hillary Clinton) didn&#8217;t discredit the principles of feminism so much as their own pathetic selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

