<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cosmopolitan Conservative &#187; Lori Ziganto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/tag/lori-ziganto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Feminism&#039;s Last Chance for Legitimacy</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/06/08/feminisms-last-chance-for-legitimacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/06/08/feminisms-last-chance-for-legitimacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Goldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanna Rosin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Ziganto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikki Haley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be careful for what you wish. The fem blogs finally noticed the craziness going down in South Carolina. Rather than use this as an opportunity to attack the establishment good ol&#8217; boy network, they question if the allegations were true. Note the Jezebel&#8216;s headline, which is the only fem outlet to cover this story the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful for what you <a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/05/27/the-deafening-silence-of-feminists-on-nikki-haley/">wish</a>. The fem blogs finally noticed the craziness going down in South Carolina. Rather than use this as an opportunity to attack the establishment good ol&#8217; boy network, they question if the allegations were true.</p>
<p>Note the <em>Jezebel</em>&#8216;s headline, which is the only fem outlet to cover this story the entire time, &#8220;<a href="http://jezebel.com/5558280/nikki-hadley-refuses-to-take-polygraph-test-testosterone-levels-affect-trust">Nikki Haley Refuses Polygraph</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>An <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-06-03/nikki-haley-sex-scandal-and-why-one-feminist-supports-her/">article</a> on <em>The Daily Beast</em> makes my skin crawl. This is exactly the type of journalism that propels me to fight feminists:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Granted, Haley has a hypocrisy problem: Like Mark Sanford, the  adulterous and love-sick Republican governor she’s trying to replace,  Haley is one of those preachy “family values” conservatives who seem to  think the rules apply to everyone but themselves. In a May <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/05/nikki-haleys-palin-approved-family-values-ad/57217/" target="_blank">TV  ad</a>, Sarah Palin is seen describing Haley as “a strong pro-family,  pro-life…conservative reformer.” A campaign flyer <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2010/05/nikki-haley-campaign-flier-touts-family-values.php?page=1" target="_blank">announces</a> that Haley “supports traditional, family values,” and in her latest TV  spot, produced after the sex scandal broke, Haley introduces her silent  and slightly dorky looking husband, the possibly cuckolded Michael, in  what might be termed a Spitzer reversal. Watching the ad made me cringe;  it’s uncomfortable to see Michael standing there next to Nikki, just as  it was uncomfortable to see Silda standing by Eliot. &#8220;What are they  thinking?&#8221; you wonder. &#8220;Why aren’t they mad as hell?&#8221;</p>
<p>Given that the allegations are likely false, and South Carolina has the political machine that would make Huey P. Long sick, how can feminists do this? They aren&#8217;t taking the high road or waiting for evidence. They&#8217;re sitting with baited breath waiting for clear proof to come out against Haley. They&#8217;re dying to bring her down.</p>
<p>This is wrong, wrong, wrong. This is exactly the same hypocrisy that feminists demonstrated with the womanizing Bill Clinton. <strong>This is one of the few times that feminists could have transcended party lines and fought for a true pro-woman cause.</strong> Every feminist blog, magazine, spokesperson and pundit should denounce the sexist operation going on in South Carolina. This type of campaigning should not be allowed to exist.</p>
<p>By primly sitting back, feminists are silently endorsing this sleazy behavior.</p>
<p>Is it too much for feminists to take a few minutes each day and read right-wing blogs? If they only read Red State, they would have seen the post penned by <a href="http://www.redstate.com/snarkandboobs/2010/06/04/die-in-a-fire-you-vicious-racist-scumbag/">Lori Ziganto</a>, a South Carolina voter, on the state&#8217;s corruption.That was the focus of the Haley campaign.<strong> Nikki Haley took on establishment corruption. Shouldn&#8217;t all women respect that regardless of political affiliation? </strong></p>
<p>Hanna Rosin at <a href="http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/nikki-haley-political-riot-grrrl">Double X </a>likens Haley to Riot Grrl, an early third-wave feminist movement. That&#8217;s a silly comparison because Haley has campaigned on her record for demanding accountability and transparency in a state that nearly operates under a cloak of darkness. Riot Grrl was a small under-the-radar movement that gave us the conflicting and ambiguous third-wave feminist definition of &#8220;as long as you&#8217;re empowered to make choices, you&#8217;re a feminist.&#8221; But through their actions over the past year, that&#8217;s proved hollow.</p>
<p>I wish the Dana Goldstein, the sleazeball masquerading as an editor at <em>The Daily Beast</em>, and Hanna Rosin, sadly one of the more reasonable writers at <em>Double X</em>, would wake up and see how futile this quote is:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Weathering a scandal of this magnitude would help conservatives see  modern women as we really are: complex, sexually liberated, and free to  make our own decisions about what we do with our bodies.</p>
<p>No Dana and Hanna. Perhaps feminists should understand how silly and marginalized your movement is now? Modern women are far more complex and view politics through a wider lense than just abortion. That&#8217;s why your movement is decreasing in size. That&#8217;s why fewer and fewer women identify as feminists. That&#8217;s why pro-life PACS are out-fundraising the old dinosaurs like EMILY&#8217;s List and NOW. That&#8217;s why more and more Americans are identifying as pro-life. And that&#8217;s why mostly conservative women won primaries across America tonight.</p>
<p>Feminists, you had one last redeeming chance to prove that your movement was legitimate. I&#8217;d say you failed&#8230;miserably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/06/08/feminisms-last-chance-for-legitimacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking on the Lefty Gals</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/04/17/taking-on-the-lefty-gals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/04/17/taking-on-the-lefty-gals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 03:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cassy Fiano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Valenti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Ziganto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=2074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, I spend a lot of time writing posts against Feministing. As a commenter Brando said the other day, &#8220;as for Feministing, the excerpt you posted is typical of their sputtering vitriol and merits no comment. They’re too busy seething with hatred to let a rational thought enter their heads.&#8221; What an accurate description! However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I spend a lot of time writing posts against <a href="http://www.feministing.com/">Feministing</a>. As a commenter <a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/04/13/lady-gaga-vs-bristol-palin/#comments">Brando</a> said the other day, &#8220;as for <em>Feministing</em>, the excerpt you posted is typical of their  sputtering vitriol and merits no comment.  They’re too busy seething  with hatred to let a rational thought enter their heads.&#8221;</p>
<p>What an accurate description! However, <em>Feministing </em>is one of the more prominent ones in lefty gal world, so people actually get their information and draw their opinions there. (Does that make you cringe, too?)</p>
<p>It makes my day when kick-ass conservative women bloggers, like <a href="http://www.redstate.com/snarkandboobs/2010/04/14/feminists-rejoice-at-idea-of-abortion-for-convenience/">Lori Ziganto</a>, take on <a href="http://jessicavalenti.com/?cat=5">Jessica Valenti</a>, founder of <em>Feministing</em>. Given that Lori actually makes logical arguments and the extent of Jessica&#8217;s are typically, &#8220;but that&#8217;s so f&#8212;ing stupid to ME, so THEY are wrong.&#8221; (Don&#8217;t believe me? Read her books). Apparently Lori ruffled a few feathers, which resulted in <a href="http://www.cassyfiano.com/2010/04/jessica-valenti-college-is-totally-worth-killing-babies-over">Cassy Fiano</a> responding at <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/17/jessica-valenti-college-is-totally-worth-killing-babies-over/">Hot Air</a>.</p>
<p>What was all the fuss over? A simple ad in NYC subways that states, &#8220;abortion changes you.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/abortionchangesyouad.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2075" title="abortionchangesyouad" src="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/abortionchangesyouad-286x300.jpg" alt="" width="286" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>For the past few months, I&#8217;ve read <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/020333.html">numerous</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/03/09/abortion_changes_you">reports</a> about <a href="http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/final-take-abortion-changes-you-campaign">pro-abortion women</a> <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/03/12/bits-and-pieces-3/">angered</a> at the concept that abortion could change you. As John Hawkins <a href="http://rightwingnews.com/2010/04/abortion-safe-legal-and-oh-who-am-i-kidding-kill-it-kill-it/">described</a>, it&#8217;s rather mild. Yet to feminists, this ad was incredibly offensive. No one should dare question <em>their</em> opinion on abortion. As liberal women, <em>they </em>have the final word.</p>
<p>Cassy touches on a subject that I&#8217;ve tried to <a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/02/24/celebrating-abortion/">understand</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It’s like they practically salivate over the thought of another woman  getting an abortion.  I don’t know why, but it’s sickening how much  feminists try to actively convince women to have abortions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that same enthusiasm and find it cold and calculating. Mentally, I&#8217;ve started referring to these type of women as the baby killer cheerleaders. You have women <a href="http://www.imnotsorry.net/">reveling</a> in their abortion stories, <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/020634.html">bowling</a> for abortion, <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/">blogging</a> for abortion and <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/25/live-tweeting-abortion/">tweeting</a> an abortion. It doesn&#8217;t quite resonate with the &#8220;safe, legal, rare&#8221; drumbeat that liberals tried to use in the 90s. I guess the new motto is &#8220;YEA! ABORTION!&#8221;</p>
<p>As part of the larger liberal movement, feminists completely eliminate the concept of personal responsibility. A group of women doesn&#8217;t want to accept responsibilities for their actions and are convinced that women can and <em>should</em> have the same sexual abandon as a frat boy. They don&#8217;t want to deal with the consequences, and abortion makes it convenient for them. Don&#8217;t want a baby? Poof! Abortion makes the little unwanted mass of tissues disappear.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t work that way, and a <a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/03/16/a-prolife-rebellion/">majority</a> of Americans agree. Every woman who stands up and says, &#8220;this attitude and behavior is not acceptable&#8221; only highlights the shallow callousness of pro-abortion women. In order to succeed, they must silence all opposition and bully other women into agreeing with them. That&#8217;s the only pro-woman way, right?</p>
<p>Kudos to Cassy and Lori. I wish more women on the right would take on Jessica Valenti and others like her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/04/17/taking-on-the-lefty-gals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

