<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cosmopolitan Conservative &#187; sexism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/tag/sexism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is this sexist?</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/06/02/is-this-sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/06/02/is-this-sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=2347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asylum, which appears to be a site geared towards guys under 35, has an article about interpreting a woman&#8217;s flirting body language. Feministing highlights it, and calls it &#8220;the most ridiculous, over-hyped piece of sexist schlock.&#8221; Is it over-hyped sexism? You be the judge. While the author could have used better semantics in describing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/obedient2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2351" style="margin: 6px;" title="obedient" src="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/obedient2-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>Asylum, which appears to be a site geared towards guys under 35, has an article about interpreting a woman&#8217;s <a href="http://www.asylum.com/2010/05/27/how-to-read-women-flirting-body-language-signals-how-to-guide/">flirting body language</a>. <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/021378.html">Feministing</a> highlights it, and calls it &#8220;the most ridiculous, over-hyped piece of sexist schlock.&#8221; Is it over-hyped sexism? You be the judge.</p>
<p>While the author could have used better semantics in describing the woman&#8217;s body language (obedient is <em>always</em> a bad way to describe a woman), is this overtly sexist? Sexism is typically hard to define and is based on interpretation. Feminists have blatantly ignored the way that <a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/05/27/the-deafening-silence-of-feminists-on-nikki-haley/">Nikki Haley</a> was treated in the press and threatened by a scummy blogger, but they have time to dissect an article about women&#8217;s body language on a website geared towards guys? Guess it&#8217;s all about priorities.</p>
<p>I found the article funny in the &#8220;this is really how guys perceive us?&#8221; sense. Do you expect more from a site that posts video footage from a <a href="http://www.asylum.com/2010/06/02/jedis-invade-lower-east-side-wielding-light-sabers-virginity/">lightsaber duel </a>in NYC and goes to <a href="http://video.aol.com">Russell Brand</a> for relationship advice? I&#8217;m not going to click on <em>Feministing</em> and expect to see a story on how awesome Michele Bachmann is. Why would <em>Feministing</em> expect to see an insightful article on male/female relationships at Asylum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/06/02/is-this-sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cupcakes Have a Gender?</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/02/26/cupcakes-have-a-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/02/26/cupcakes-have-a-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butch Bakery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butch Cupcakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cupcakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dessert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Wayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucky Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlboro Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrosexuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/?p=1822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few weeks, I&#8217;ve noticed a number of feminism blogs and even the Wall Street Journal discussing the new Butch Bakery cupcakes sold in New York City. Billed as the &#8220;manly cupcake,&#8221; it comes in 12 different varieties such as, the Jackhammer, Campout and Driller. While some of them sound really good like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few weeks, I&#8217;ve noticed a <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/020122.html">number</a> of<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/25/how-many-manly-cupcakes-must-a-man-devour-before-you-can-call-him-a-man/#comments"> feminism</a> <a href="http://jezebel.com/5471460/the-butch-bakery-manly-cupcakes-for-manly-men">blogs</a> and even the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704479404575087420338070854.html?mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular">Wall Street Journal</a> discussing the new <a href="http://www.butchbakery.com/">Butch Bakery</a> cupcakes sold in New York City. Billed as the &#8220;manly cupcake,&#8221; it comes in 12 different varieties such as, the Jackhammer, Campout and Driller.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Butch-Cupcakes.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1823" title="Butch Cupcakes" src="http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Butch-Cupcakes-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="198" /></a></p>
<p>While some of them sound really good like the Rum &amp; Coke and Sidecar, my first reaction was to laugh. Do guys really look at desserts and deem them too feminine to eat? During my years working in various PR sectors, I&#8217;ve thrown a lot of events and fundraisers and attended even more. I&#8217;ve never seen men refuse sweets because they were too &#8220;girly.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s an interesting gimmick, and I&#8217;m not going to fault anyone for being an entrepreneur. It does strike me as odd because the most masculine examples that come to mind never acknowledge the &#8220;masculinity&#8221; factor. Unless it&#8217;s some Tim Allen comedy routine, did the Marlboro Man or John Wayne ever discuss the inherent sexism in cupcakes? The concept of a manly cupcake simply conflicts with the image of masculinity. Would Don Draper put down his Lucky Strike to pick up a Butch Cupcake?</p>
<p>Is this an interesting sales pitch or masculinity interpreted through the eyes of an urbanized, metrosexual male? According to the web site, &#8220;Our objective is simple. We&#8217;re men. Men who like cupcakes. Not the frilly, pink-frosted sprinkles-and-unicorn kind of cupcakes. We make manly cupcakes. For manly men.&#8221; (They need James Earl Jones to narrate the site for the most impact.)</p>
<p>Are real men going to seek out the most masculine type of cupcakes available or wander clueless into the nearest Walmart and ask the bakery department for cupcakes because their wife/girlfriend/mother sent them? Is this like the dessert version of the cocktail? Real men aren&#8217;t going to eat cupcakes covered in sprinkles or order fruity cocktails with paper umbrellas?</p>
<p>I also feel like we&#8217;ve arrived at some pre-apocalyptic point in society when reality has turned into a Mel Brooks/Monty Python satire because people are seriously discussing the gender implications of cupcakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanconservative.com/2010/02/26/cupcakes-have-a-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

